MENTOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT

English overview · product beta currently in Chinese

PERSONALIZED MANUSCRIPT REVIEW

Your expertise.
Your assistant.

Turn your manuscript guidance into a personal research assistant.

Spend less time repeating routine corrections.
Keep your attention on the decisions that matter.

Discuss a research-group trial →Explore a real example ↓
1

Your expertise. Your assistant.

Understands manuscript review.
Adapts to the way you review.

Turn your real manuscript comments into reusable rules for feedback on new drafts.

Your priorities

Focus on the issues you repeatedly flag.

Your standards

Turn your specific expectations into reusable rules.

Your guidance

Use those rules to shape revision advice.

General checks find routine issues. Your guidance determines what to emphasize and how to suggest revisions.

2

From your comments to new feedback

1

Original supervisor comment

English translation of a real case excerpt

The opening discussion paragraph is important. Highlight the innovation and main findings without repeating too many methods or results. Keep it concise.

View original Chinese case excerptOriginal redacted case excerpt: Original supervisor comment
2

Reusable review rule

English translation of a real case excerpt

Identify repetition of methods and result values. Summarize concisely, foreground innovation and key findings, and avoid excessive repetition.

View original Chinese case excerptOriginal redacted case excerpt: Reusable review rule
3

Feedback on a new draft

English translation of a real case excerpt

The opening discussion repeats result values (C-index, sHR, nomogram) but gives too little emphasis to innovation and key findings. Condense the recap and leave details for later.

View original Chinese case excerptOriginal redacted case excerpt: Feedback on a new draft
3

Your rules + nine foundational checks

1

Research aims & endpoints

A focused research question and a clear, single primary endpoint.

2

Data consistency

Agreement between values reported across the manuscript.

3

Section structure

Missing, repeated or misplaced content across sections.

4

Methods

Whether the methods suit the study.

5

Mechanistic claims

Whether the proposed explanations go beyond the data.

6

References

Bibliographic validity and correspondence with in-text citations.

7

Formatting

Figures, tables, units and submission conventions.

8

AI-like phrasing

Wording that may read as AI-generated; not proof of AI use.

9

Required declarations

Funding, author contributions and data availability statements.

4

Upload. Review. Download.

The screenshots show the current Chinese-language beta. The English interface is in progress; each caption explains the workflow step. No product data has been altered.

1. Submit a manuscript

Upload a Word (.docx) file and optionally specify your review priorities.

View original beta interfaceOriginal Chinese beta interface: Submit a manuscript

2. Retrieve your feedback

Check processing status in My Submissions, then download the annotated manuscript and review report.

View original beta interfaceOriginal Chinese beta interface: Retrieve your feedback
5

Two practical deliverables

DELIVERABLE 1

Annotated manuscript

Specific issues and revision guidance attached to the text.

View original annotated manuscriptOriginal annotated manuscript with Chinese review comments

DELIVERABLE 2 · Structured review report

Expand any category to view the original Chinese example. All original redactions are preserved.

Overall assessment · StrengthsOriginal case example: Overall assessment · Strengths
Overall assessment · Major issuesOriginal case example: Overall assessment · Major issues
Issue summary tableOriginal case example: Issue summary table
Formatting notesOriginal case example: Formatting notes
References · Bibliographic checksOriginal case example: References · Bibliographic checks
References · Citation correspondenceOriginal case example: References · Citation correspondence
Questions requiring the author’s judgmentOriginal case example: Questions requiring the author’s judgment
6

Early trial feedback

~80%

less review time per manuscript

Prof. Jiuda Zhao’s personal estimate after trial use; not a timed experiment.

Based on approximately 7–8 manuscripts. Not a general performance guarantee.

7

Pilot collaborator

Prof. Jiuda Zhao

Professor · Chief Physician · Doctoral Supervisor

Deputy Director, Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University.
PhD, Peking Union Medical College. Research focus: breast cancer.

10

PhD students

12

Master’s students

2

Undergraduate students

Research funding

Principal investigator on three National Natural Science Foundation of China projects and one National Science and Technology Major Project.

Publications

More than 100 SCI-indexed papers as first or corresponding author, including shared authorship. Publications include Journal of Clinical Oncology (two papers), Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, JAMA Network Open, eClinicalMedicine, Journal of Hematology & Oncology, and Immunology.

Peer review & editorial service

Reviewing experience for the BMJ, The Lancet Oncology, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy and more than 20 other journals. Editorial board member, Cancer Innovation.

8

Trials & collaboration

Bring your guidance
to every new draft.

Discuss a trial with your research group.

For international collaborators, email is preferred.

Email tacetlunwen@163.comCall +86 132 8510 8321

WeChat contact QR code
Scan with WeChatWeChat is optional; email is preferred for international collaborators.
Mentor Personal Assistant